Are You Using The Pyramid of Giving?

By: Michael Taylor, CFRE, CEO

On occasion, it’s important to return to the fundamentals of fundraising. The Pyramid of Giving is a key fundamental because it illustrates a theoretical overview of development and reminds us of the inextricable relationship between deepening donor engagement and raising more revenue. (See picture below.)

But times have changed. Some fundraising experts say the Pyramid is no longer relevant, while others claim it can be adapted. I fall in the latter camp. What about you?

There’s no doubt that the Pyramid is linear. It documents the steps through which a donor moves as their commitment to increases.

In a sophisticated development department, the fundraiser’s goal is to qualify current donors at each stage and, wherever appropriate, encourage the donor’s upward movement in the Pyramid through increased giving.

Increased giving doesn’t only mean raising the amount of the gift but also includes making gifts monthly, multi-year pledges, and legacy gifts, to name a few moves.

Highlights

Looking over the Pyramid below, you see four types of fundraising:

  1. Annual Giving is the primary fundraising method used to gain support, upgrade giving levels, provide operating support for day-to-day operations, and support on-going programs.
  2. Capital Giving is an intensive, organized development effort to secure philanthropic gifts for specific capital needs or projects, executed within a specific time period, usually over one or more years.
  3. Planned Giving is the integration of sound personal, financial, and estate planning with the individual donor’s plans for lifetime or testamentary giving.
  4. Transformational Giving is a type of giving that is historical to your nonprofit. Here are a few examples: a building is named for a major donor, an endowment is created or expanded, an annual gift is pledged for multiple years. Sadly, most nonprofits do not even offer their donors transformational giving options. 

What’s the Point?

A donor is not someone who gives once but who gives repeatedly and at increased levels.

The point of using the Pyramid is to guide your thinking about how to engage the donor toward increased investment. It’s a fact that as we age, we tend to have more resources to share. That means that following your donor on their life trajectory is wise.

When a trained fundraiser uses the Pyramid, we transfer skills to your board, administration, and development staff. In the Pyramid, you see the path to implement an integrated development solution leading to more revenue.  Having sufficient revenue ensures the fulfillment of your institution’s mission. Remember, development is a process, not an event!

Old Fashion?

Some fundraisers find the Pyramid old fashion and show a preference for a model similar to an unsprung spring, a series of cyclical loops where we circle back to the donor for feedback.

There is merit to that new thinking, and I like those models, but they do not negate the Pyramid. The two approaches should coexist.

My colleague Andrea Kihstedt supports this integrated view

You see, if you use the Pyramid to guide your thinking, you will likely have more major gifts, planned gifts, and legacy gifts designated in the donor’s estate plan. This is in contrast to the fact that only 9% of donors make a legacy plan. (I would like to see that percentage rise to at least 50%!) The percentage is so low because we are not using the Pyramid!

You will want to know where you’re headed with your donors, assuming they are along for the ride with your nonprofit. The Pyramid helps you see that.

Andrea says it this way:  “In fundraising, while all donors are important, not all donors are equal….social media has neither toppled nor crumbled the donor pyramid! The donor pyramid is alive and well in capital campaign fundraising where it got its start.  And if used properly, it continues to have important applications in all fundraising campaigns. When organizations use the donor pyramid to focus their attention on raising large gifts, that’s just what happens — they raise large gifts.”

To view our full PDF on the Pyramid of Giving, click here.

We welcome your comments about this post on the NPI blog.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Has Donor Trust in Charities Changed?

In this age of “fake news”, “alternative facts” “hyper partisanship” and what seems to be a general erosion of trust, why should we even care?  And if we care what can we fundraisers do about it?

Of course, every fundraiser should care because trust is the lynchpin of a solid and sustainable relationship with a donor.  And because there are ways to measure trust, taking steps to increase the level of trust, and by doing so increase donor value and an organization’s net revenue.

Read More »

MacKenzie Strikes Again

You probably won’t recognize most of the names on the list of the top 50 mega-philanthropists.

MacKenzie Scott’s name, though, immediately rings a bell and puts a smile on the face of those of us serving in the non-profit sector.

Ironically, she is not on that list, unlike her ex-husband.

Yet we love her for the special sensitivity she shows us, and her latest “strike,” an announcement to give away $250 million in funding to small nonprofits, is no exception.

Read More »

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »