Defining & Naming Your Leadership Council

By: Michael Taylor, CFRE, CEO

This is part two of a five part series on leadership councils.

Part One: “What Does A Leadership Council Do?” (click the text to read the full post)

Finding a powerful name, and defining the purpose, should be top on your list of tasks as you start and develop your Leadership Council. Here’s three reasons why:

  1. You want the members themselves and the public to take notice.
  2. You want to convey energy and vision.
  3. You want to differentiate it from the Board of Directors.

Meeting all three criteria is essential.

Secondly, there are many ways to define your council to make it attractive and give it direction. Consider any one of these:

“Friends of…” is general enough to fit many designations and what’s especially nice about this moniker is that it immediately tells a story. Friends help someone in need and do so out of love and friendship (i.e., without ulterior motives).

Sometimes “Honorary Council” makes sense, especially if your council is comprised mostly of past trustees or alumni.

I have seen Leaders Council’s named “The President’s Councils, The Volunteer Council, and even the generic, although not recommended, Fundraising Council.

There are also Councils that are really time limited “task forces” (on gun violence, coastal preservation, ending bedbugs in public housing, and so forth).

Frequently a Leadership Council relates to a major capital campaign and that’s fine too, but that sort of Council is often called a Campaign Cabinet.

Lastly, depending on your need for the Council, plus the type of members you hope to attract, an appropriate powerful name should be crafted in the way that it will best serve your purpose.

So many names of Leadership Councils are too generic. For example, why couldn’t the American Nurses Association call their Council “Healers.” Or consider Brown University’s Women’s Leadership Council, could it be named, “United”?

The point is to find a name that best reflects your reason for establishing the council.

I strongly encourage you to test the name out on a few people you trust before deciding.

We welcome your comments about this post on the NPI blog.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Has Donor Trust in Charities Changed?

In this age of “fake news”, “alternative facts” “hyper partisanship” and what seems to be a general erosion of trust, why should we even care?  And if we care what can we fundraisers do about it?

Of course, every fundraiser should care because trust is the lynchpin of a solid and sustainable relationship with a donor.  And because there are ways to measure trust, taking steps to increase the level of trust, and by doing so increase donor value and an organization’s net revenue.

Read More »

MacKenzie Strikes Again

You probably won’t recognize most of the names on the list of the top 50 mega-philanthropists.

MacKenzie Scott’s name, though, immediately rings a bell and puts a smile on the face of those of us serving in the non-profit sector.

Ironically, she is not on that list, unlike her ex-husband.

Yet we love her for the special sensitivity she shows us, and her latest “strike,” an announcement to give away $250 million in funding to small nonprofits, is no exception.

Read More »

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »