Donors Drop By 7% But Dollars Up 6.2%, Buoyed By Major Donors

U.S. charitable giving increased significantly in Q2 2022, but gains were accompanied by a continuing steep decline in donor acquisition and retention, particularly among new and newly retained donors, according to the Fundraising Effectiveness Project’s (FEP) Second Quarter Fundraising Report.

The Fundraising Effectiveness Project (FEP) is a collaboration among fundraising data providers, researchers, analysts, associations, and consultants to empower the sector to track and evaluate trends in giving. The project offers one of the only views of the current year’s fundraising data in aggregate to provide the most recent trends for guiding nonprofit fundraising and donor engagement. The FEP releases quarterly findings on those giving trends, released both via downloadable reports at afpfep.org and in a free online dashboard.

 

FEP Q2 2022 Report Key Takeaways

  • Q2 giving data shows donor counts down steeply, driven by declines in small (sub $500) donor segments, as well as in new donor acquisition and retention. On the other hand, recaptured donors, and newly retained donors, which had both dropped in Q1, rose moderately, and stabilized in Q2.
  • At the same time, dollars are up, largely due to increased giving by major donors, although this increase of 6.2% (estimated for late data) is nonetheless lower than the Q2 inflation rate of approximately 8.5%
  • Despite decreasing overall donor counts, fundraising is up thanks to increasing recapture rates (people who donated sometime in the past, but not last year). That segment may include COVID donors being recaptured or the return of pre-COVID donors who paused their giving during the pandemic.

With new and newly retained donor counts dropping steeply for the 4th consecutive quarter, along with the high organizational dropout rate during this same period, the COVID era in the charitable giving sector continues to unfold in complex and challenging ways.

“It is clear that donor retention is a major challenge for fundraisers across the sector,” says Tim Sarrantonio, Dir. of Corp. Brand for Neon One. “The universality of the pandemic crisis led to the emergence of many new donors, especially in the smaller donor segments. However with a 7.4% drop in retention last year followed by a further drop of 5.2% through Q2 2022, the need for more effective retention tactics is becoming more and more obvious.”

“With so much volatility in donor acquisition and retention now would be an excellent time to invest in broad grassroots engagement,” according to Woodrow Rosenbaum, Chief Data Officer at Giving Tuesday. “This is an important way to create resilience within the sector—and within individual organizations—in order to weather economic storms.”

“The increase in fundraising dollars can be largely attributed to recaptured donors—those who contributed again after not doing so last year,” Lori Gusdorf, CAE, Executive Vice President of the  AFP Foundation for Philanthropy, explains. “This underlines the importance of employing targeted strategies for retaining this key donor segment, especially in times of economic volatility, when donors are more frequently evaluating their financial commitments. Organizations could reap considerable benefits by ensuring they stay relevant for this group through consistent solicitation and outreach activities.”

The Fundraising Effectiveness Project 

The Fundraising Effectiveness Project publishes quarterly and annual reports that examine key fundraising metrics, serving as a benchmark for nonprofit executives, development staff and researchers. The Fundraising Effectiveness Project and the Growth in Giving database are both administered by the Association of Fundraising Professionals Foundation for Philanthropy and The GivingTuesday Data Commons.

The Growth in Giving database is the world’s largest public record of donation activity, with more than 204 million donation transactions, and is continuously updated by leading fundraising software thought leaders (in alphabetical order) Bloomerang, DonorPerfect, Keela, and NeonCRM. Additional partners include the 7th Day Adventists, The Biedermann Group, DataLake Nonprofit Research, and DonorTrends (a division of EveryAction). For more information and how you or your fundraising software provider can participate, please visit www.afpfep.org.

How will this most recent data change your year-end fundraising? Let us know in the comments below. Please share this post with a colleague who may be interested.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Has Donor Trust in Charities Changed?

In this age of “fake news”, “alternative facts” “hyper partisanship” and what seems to be a general erosion of trust, why should we even care?  And if we care what can we fundraisers do about it?

Of course, every fundraiser should care because trust is the lynchpin of a solid and sustainable relationship with a donor.  And because there are ways to measure trust, taking steps to increase the level of trust, and by doing so increase donor value and an organization’s net revenue.

Read More »

MacKenzie Strikes Again

You probably won’t recognize most of the names on the list of the top 50 mega-philanthropists.

MacKenzie Scott’s name, though, immediately rings a bell and puts a smile on the face of those of us serving in the non-profit sector.

Ironically, she is not on that list, unlike her ex-husband.

Yet we love her for the special sensitivity she shows us, and her latest “strike,” an announcement to give away $250 million in funding to small nonprofits, is no exception.

Read More »

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »