Dueling Trends: Grants are Increasing, but Grant Seekers are Increasingly Unhappy

By: Michael Taylor, CFRE, CEO

Some interesting findings have been reported by the Foundation Center and Independent Sector this year.

First, the Foundation Center.

For the sixth straight year, FC reports, community foundations show growth in assets, registering an average 11% increase in 2014 over 2013 assets levels.

Gifts to community foundations grew by 16% in 2014; community foundations increased their grants by an average of 17%.

New York State ranks first in the nation on number of foundations (9,880) and overall giving  ($8.7 billion).

Overall giving by the nation’s private and community foundations reached $54.7 billion in 2013,  surpassing previous record levels even after adjusting for inflation.

Overall foundation giving continued to grow a few points ahead of inflation in 2014. Independent and family foundations showed an ever higher rate of growth.

Sounds good, right?

Meanwhile, Independent Sector issued a report in October 2015 entitled Threads: Insights from the Charitable Community, based on coast-to-coast conversations with development professionals. “It’s clear,” states IS, “that there was tension between grant makers and grant seekers.” Here are some specifics:

Nonprofits report that the process of securing funds wastes time, too often devalues the expertise of organizations, and requires grantees acquiesce to foundation demands.

In addition, there is frustration when foundations “force nonprofits to engage,” in the words of one participant, in unproductive exercises to measure outcomes that the funders deem important even when the nonprofit believes that measurement of its impact should be differently focused.

Funders’ obsession with logic models and evaluation has forced nonprofits to produce creative fiction.

Participants mentioned the need to overcome communication barriers at multiple levels: between nonprofits and community stakeholders; between grant makers and grant seekers; and between sector organizations and both business and government.

Communication must be authentic…Create space for candor from all players and invite stakeholders from different perspectives to test assumptions.

The unavoidable conclusion: prospects are high for increased giving, but there are rumblings in the nonprofit hills! Stay tuned!

What trends have you observed in the past year?

We welcome your comments about this post on the NPI blog.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Has Donor Trust in Charities Changed?

In this age of “fake news”, “alternative facts” “hyper partisanship” and what seems to be a general erosion of trust, why should we even care?  And if we care what can we fundraisers do about it?

Of course, every fundraiser should care because trust is the lynchpin of a solid and sustainable relationship with a donor.  And because there are ways to measure trust, taking steps to increase the level of trust, and by doing so increase donor value and an organization’s net revenue.

Read More »

MacKenzie Strikes Again

You probably won’t recognize most of the names on the list of the top 50 mega-philanthropists.

MacKenzie Scott’s name, though, immediately rings a bell and puts a smile on the face of those of us serving in the non-profit sector.

Ironically, she is not on that list, unlike her ex-husband.

Yet we love her for the special sensitivity she shows us, and her latest “strike,” an announcement to give away $250 million in funding to small nonprofits, is no exception.

Read More »

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »